(1) Except as otherwise mentioned in the documents relating to proposal, for the purpose of evaluation of a financial proposal, the service charges of the consultant specified in the proposal shall be deemed to include reimbursable expenses such as tax, other than value added tax, leviable on the consultant pursuant to the prevailing law, consultant's travel, translation of the concerned documents, report printing or overhead cost.
(2) If, in evaluating the financial proposal of each proponent, the evaluation committee finds any arithmetical error in the proposal, the public entity may correct such an error, and if, in so correcting the error, there is any discrepancy between the unit rate and the total amount, the unit rate shall prevail and the total amount shall be corrected as per the same rate. Where the error is so corrected, information thereof shall be given to the concerned proponent.
(3) If any discrepancy is found between the number and words in the amount quoted by the proponent in the financial proposal, the amount quoted in words shall prevail.
(4) If the record (Muchulka) of opening financial proposal sets out that the proponent has offered to provide any discount to the proposed quoted price, the evaluation committee shall adjust the amount proposed to be so discounted.
(5) After the evaluation referred to in sub-rules (2), (3) and (4), a list of the fixed quoted price of every proponent shall be prepared.